<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review: Harsh Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obscureporn.com/2008/11/29/movie-review-harsh-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obscureporn.com/2008/11/29/movie-review-harsh-times/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:45:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. N. Retrofist</title>
		<link>http://obscureporn.com/2008/11/29/movie-review-harsh-times/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>W. N. Retrofist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obscureporn.com/?p=174#comment-846</guid>
		<description>This review is no review at all.  It goes off on unpredictable tangents, comprising naught but basic plot summary and unrelated facts while avoiding meaningful criticism, commentary, and analysis entirely.  On a scale from 1 to suck, I give it a suck plus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This review is no review at all.  It goes off on unpredictable tangents, comprising naught but basic plot summary and unrelated facts while avoiding meaningful criticism, commentary, and analysis entirely.  On a scale from 1 to suck, I give it a suck plus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://obscureporn.com/2008/11/29/movie-review-harsh-times/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obscureporn.com/?p=174#comment-845</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t you have maybe summed this up in a Powerpoint presentation instead?  And what do you define as a &quot;usable&quot; toilet?  That statistic doesn&#039;t seem quite right to me, but I guess you said it pretty confidently, so I believe you.  I give this review an A+ out of 5.
-&lt;i&gt;Ben Strauss&#039;s Review Reviews&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t you have maybe summed this up in a Powerpoint presentation instead?  And what do you define as a &#8220;usable&#8221; toilet?  That statistic doesn&#8217;t seem quite right to me, but I guess you said it pretty confidently, so I believe you.  I give this review an A+ out of 5.<br />
-<i>Ben Strauss&#8217;s Review Reviews</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

